I would like to re-address the issue regarding the National
kkkorporate media being kkkontrolled by "white boys".
I certainly stand by those comments when the definition of
"white boys" is clearly defined.My definitions is based on two
definitions of "white" and one definition of "boy",which
"white" as defined as a color,is an occurrence that is natural
in origin and assumes no additional amenities.Pure and simple a
condition of nature which allows certain distinctions in skin
Now there is another condition also considered to be
associated with the natural condition of color distinction,this
is the assumption that there is some ethereal or inherent
benefit associated with One's color,which by nature determines
One to be superior either physically,intellectually or in any
other sense.The latter definition, I unequivocally dispute with
no reservations at all.
There are individuals,who have agreed with my opposition to
this insane perspective,who have endured horrendous acts of
violence,even death.The perpetrators of such,acts to me,are
individuals who have never reached levels of
spiritual,psychological,emotional or social maturity that are
representative of "manhood".Based on this definition of
"manhood",I maintain that immature male individuals who believe
that they are entitled to certain advantages ,purely based on
color are indeed immature males fundamentally,"boys"..