I would like to re-address the issue regarding the National 
kkkorporate media being kkkontrolled by "white boys".
 I certainly stand by those comments when the definition of 
"white boys" is clearly defined.My definitions is based on two 
definitions of "white" and one definition of "boy",which 
follows.
 "white" as defined as a color,is an occurrence that is natural 
in origin and assumes no additional amenities.Pure and simple a 
condition of nature which allows certain distinctions in skin 
color,nothing more.
 Now there is another condition also considered to be 
associated with the natural condition of color distinction,this 
is the assumption that there is some ethereal or inherent 
benefit associated with One's color,which by nature determines 
One to be superior either physically,intellectually or in any 
other sense.The latter definition, I unequivocally dispute with 
no reservations at all.
 There are individuals,who have agreed with my opposition to 
this insane perspective,who have endured horrendous acts of 
violence,even death.The perpetrators of such,acts to me,are  
individuals who have never reached levels of 
spiritual,psychological,emotional or social maturity that are 
representative of "manhood".Based on this definition of 
"manhood",I maintain that immature male individuals who believe 
that they are entitled to certain advantages ,purely based on 
color are indeed immature males fundamentally,"boys"..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment