Black American Reporters Absent in National kkkorporate Media Programs

CNN -
 howard kirtz - WHAT IS howard kirtz's AVERSION TO BLACK MEDIA

PEOPLE...I HESITATE TO BRING THIS UP DUE TO THE IDEA THAT THE

RESPONSE TO MY QUESTION MIGHT ,AS ALWAYS, BE MET WITH THE

CASUAL DISMISSAL OF"YOU'RE PLAYING THE "rACE" CARD".
 WELL THE UTTER THOUGHT OF ENCOUNTERING THAT ARGUMENT IS MY

EXACT MOTIVATION FOR BRINGING THIS ISSUE UP.
 SINCE wHITE bOYS KKKONTROL WHAT YOU SEE ON THE NAIONAL

KKKORPORATE MEDIA...THEY ALWAYS WANT TO INVOKE THE SUCKING

DEFENSE ,"YOU'RE PLAYING THE "rACE" CARD",WHEN YOU CHALLANGE

THEIR PREJUDICE.THIS PLAYED OUT ARGUMENT HAS BEEN USED

SUCCESSFULLY FOR GENERATIONS.IT'S A SLICK ARGUMENT WHICH SEEKS

TO OBFUSCATE THE REAL AND TRUE ISSUE.THAT ISSUE IS THEY DO

AVOID FEATURING CREDITABLE BLACK "AMERICAN" JOURNALIST BY

REPLACING THEM WITH THE wHITE bOY TRICK OF SUBSTITUTING THEIR

wHITE OPINION OF WHAT THE BLACK AMERICAN'S PERSPECTIVE IS,WHICH

HAS BEEN DONE FOREVER.
 AT FIRST GLANCE YOU MIGHT LOOK AT WHAT I'M SAYING AND

COMMENT,"HERE IS THE OPINION OF ANOTHER "rACIST" BLACK

PERSON".IF THAT IS YOUR RESPONSE,YOU AGAIN SEEK TO AVOID THE

SUBJECT OF "wHITE bOY" KKKONTROL OF THE NATIONAL KKKORPORATE 

MEDIA.PLEASE BE INTELLECTUALLY HONEST ENOUGH TO STAY ON

SUBJECT.DON'T ATTEMPT TO DIVERT ATTENTION AND DISTRACT FROM THE

FUNDEMENTAL ISSUES INCLUDED HERE."wHITE bOYS" DO INDEED

KKKONTROL THE NATIONAL KKKORPORATE MEDIA,AS THEY HAVE FOR

GENERATIONS.
 NOW LET ME PROVIDE A CLEAR DEFINITION OF THE ADJECTIVE "wHITE"

AND THE NOUN bOY.
 WHITE AS DEFINED BY DICTIONARIES.COM
1.(of human beings) marked by slight pigmentation of the skin,

as of many Caucasoid s.
2.for, limited to, or predominantly made up of persons whose

racial heritage is Caucasian: a white club; a white

neighborhood.
3.light or comparatively light in color.

 THERE YOU GO,AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS DEFINITION THE ADJECTIVE

"wHITE" ERRONEOUSLY REFERS TO "rACE".NOW,WHEN YOU THINK OF

"rACE" YOU HAVE TO THINK THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MAY FEEL

THEY ARE,IN SOME WAY SEPARATE FROM OTHER HUMANS BECAUSE OF

THEIR "SPECIAL" "rACE".I WILL NOT QUIBBLE WITH THAT PERSPECTIVE

AT THIS POINT,BUT I WILL MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT THERE ARE

THOSE WHO FEEL "ENTITLED" TO SOME SPECIAL TREATMENT,PURELY

BASED ON THEIR "COLOR". THEY ACTUALLY SEEM TO BELIEVE THAT

COLOR IS THE BASIS FOR SOME SUPERIORITY AMONG HUMAN BEINGS.THIS

IS WHERE I FIND ERRORS IN THEIR JUDGMENT."COLOR" IN MY OPINION

IS A DISTINCT FEATURE,WITHOUT QUESTION. HOWEVER,DISTINCT

FEATURE DOES NOT SIGNIFY,ON IT'S OWN,ANY SUCH SUPERIORITY.BUT

YOU HAVE SEEN ,AGAIN FOR GENERATIONS,PEOPLE HAVE MADE THAT

PURELY SUBJECTIVE DETERMINATION.
 MY BONE OF CONTENTION IS FOUND IN THE FACT, THAT DESPITE THE

OBVIOUS FALLACIOUS ASSERTION OF SUPERIORITY BEING BASED ON

"COLOR"AS VALID AND IRREFUTABLE POSITION,COLOR ALONE IS NOT AN

ACCURATE INDICATION OF INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORITY.NOR SHOULD

"COLOR" ALLOW ANYONE THE UNILATERAL ABILITY TO DISALLOW OTHERS

FROM BEING REPRESENTED ACCURATELY IN EVERY ASPECT OF SOCIETY.
 THIS IS WHY I AM DISMAYED WHEN I SEE "SUPPOSED" MEDIA

PROFESSIONALS,SUCH A HOWARD KIRTZ,CASUALLY IGNORE THE ABSENCE

OF DIVERSE VIEWS ON MEDIA ISSUES.
 TO FRIVOLOUSLY INTRODUCE THE "rACE CARD" ARGUMENT IN ANY

SITUATION, IS ABOUT AS SIGNIFICANT AS SUGGESTING THAT TO NOT

INCLUDE "wHITE WOMEN" IN NATIONAL KKKORPORATE MEDIA IS PLAYING

THE "gENDER CARD".